13 comments

  • ntstatusquo 14 hours ago
    You can get a sub 20kb executable with C in MSVC and no weird tricks, i.e. just setting a particular combination of compiler/linker flags, like /NODEFAULTIB, /MERGE, /FILEALIGN:512 etc. Small enough that it's basically nothing, downloads in a couple of seconds over 56k dialup, and you get to use normal tooling. This is the compromise that makes the most sense to me, for products you're actually shipping. If you want to try out the nocrt approach, honestly the LLMs do a fine job of writing you some replacements for the parts of the crt that you likely want i.e. memcpy/memcmp/strlen helpers, with x64/arm64 SIMD and all.

    Set /HEAP:4096,4096 and /STACK:65536,4096, write yourself a simple 100 line growable arena implementation, use that, avoid the heap entirely. Very quick and easy way to get a real windows program up and running that uses about 500kb of commit at baseline.

    You end up with only ntdll.dll, kernelbase.dll, and kernel32.dll loaded. Trying to eliminate any of these becomes pretty painful and you venture into the territory of weird tricks that are expensive to maintain.

    Dave's approach is a fun exercise though.

    • Dwedit 11 hours ago
      Then you load User32.dll, and you get 2MB of commit and 1MB of private bytes. Throw in a Message Box, and it's 272KB more private bytes and 388K more commit.

      Windows 10 makes it literally impossible to write something that uses low memory and uses an actual window.

  • delta_p_delta_x 21 hours ago
    Interesting to bypass CRT and work directly against the Windows API. That said, these rely on USER.32.DLL and KERNEL32.DLL to do the majority of the heavy lifting.

    It's a bit like 'smallest hello world in assembly' but the code is just setting up the calling convention and then passing the zero-terminated character string into `write`. Cool, but that could be done a bit more straightforwardly in C, too. A lot of assembly (including in the linked repository) is book-keeping for the platform's calling convention.

    • skrellm 21 hours ago
      > That said, these rely on USER.32.DLL and KERNEL32.DLL to do the majority of the heavy lifting.

      Since the low-level Windows kernel API is undocumented and non-public, using these system DLLs is your only option on Windows.

      It's just like linking against libc.so on any POSIX systems.

      • Pannoniae 18 hours ago
        no, you can also call ntdll (or even syscalls although those aren't stable), there's plenty of documentation on the internet

        but also why would you, not much point except for very niche functionality

        • skrellm 15 hours ago
          > no, you can also call ntdll (or even syscalls although those aren't stable), there's plenty of documentation on the internet

          I mean officially. Yes, you can find some on the internet, but nothing on the official MSDN.

          > but also why would you, not much point except for very niche functionality

          Exactly. Using system DLL API is backward and forward compatible, and just as standardized and well-documented as the POSIX API. I see no problem relying on it.

          (Sidenote: as a bonus, MSDN is surprisingly good, understandable, well organized, lots of examples. I rarely say this, but well done MS, that's how a dev doc should be.)

    • munchler 21 hours ago
      It’s a minimal Windows app, so the whole idea is to rely on Windows DLLs as much as possible.
      • actionfromafar 20 hours ago
        Officially, one should not use KERNEL32.dll for instance but go via crt. In practice, most interfaces are stable.
        • delta_p_delta_x 20 hours ago
          KERNEL32.DLL (in spite of the name) provides user-mode system services for the Windows API. The CRT provides the C99 API. There are many entry points to the same thing on Windows; you can do any of `malloc`/`HeapAlloc`/`new`/`VirtualAlloc` to get a void* memory buffer. `malloc` is from the CRT; `HeapAlloc` is from KERNEL32.DLL, and `new` is from the C++ runtime.
        • neonz80 20 hours ago
          kernel32 is an official API, you're probably thinking of ntdll. CRT is the C-runtime. Not everything is written in C.
          • actionfromafar 20 hours ago
            Yes, you are right, must have been thinking of ntdll.
  • Dwedit 11 hours ago
    I made my own 64-byte MS-DOS stub that uses a shorter message "Win32 Only!" instead of the usual "This program can only be run in DOS mode" message. By using the shorter stub, using the secret flag to omit the Rich header, and possibly merging sections together, I can usually get the PE header to fit within 512 bytes, and the linker won't pad out the PE header to 1024 bytes.

    A copy can be found at https://github.com/Dwedit/NoCopilotKey/blob/main/stub.bin

  • rfgplk 17 hours ago
    "smallest possible" is exactly one instruction; possibly 0xc3 [ret] or 0x90 [nop]; the problem lies in how you define "complete Windows application", because the answer really differs depending on if you want to make it ABI compliant. But there's nothing preventing you from creating a custom loader/executor that reads a pure binary file, maps it as exec and runs it.
    • chuckadams 15 hours ago
      A .COM file is exactly that, a pure binary that just starts executing at the first byte. Mind you the loader for those has gotten a smidge bigger since its first version.
    • QuantumNomad_ 16 hours ago
      It should be an exe file you can double click and execute.
  • haunter 20 hours ago
    Meanwhile in the Unix world you can go as low as 45 bytes https://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/software/tiny/teensy.ht...
    • Someone 20 hours ago
      Unfair comparison. The Windows tool (FTA):

      “Runs a Windows message loop Has a title bar, minimize, maximize, and close buttons, which all work as expected Has a system menu with the same Paints the background and some text centered in the middle, equal to or larger than "Dave's Tiny App"”

      That Linux program:

      “Let’s take an incredibly simple program, one that does nothing but return a number back to the operating system”

      See https://archive.is/w01DO#selection-265.0-265.44 for a fairer comparison (97/133 bytes)

    • WalterGR 19 hours ago
      97 bytes for Windows at the time this very nice walkthrough was written: http://www.phreedom.org/research/tinype/
    • Bluestein 20 hours ago
      Goodness gracious me.-
  • abcd_f 17 hours ago
    The smallest meaningful program for MS-DOS was exactly 2 bytes:

      FA F4
    
    That's CLI HLT, which effectively deadlocked the machine. Had to be saved as a .com fule obviously, not as an .exe.
    • smokel 13 hours ago
      Somewhat more meaningful was "INT 19h" (CD 19), which also took 2 bytes and started the boot loader, bypassing the slow boot sequence of most systems.

      And wouldn't a single instruction such as NOP or HLT be simply 1 byte?

      • abcd_f 57 minutes ago
        Yeah, but the first one does nothing at all and the second does nothing for a bit :)
      • AdieuToLogic 10 hours ago
        >> The smallest meaningful program for MS-DOS was exactly 2 bytes ...

        > Somewhat more meaningful was "INT 19h" (CD 19) ...

        I seem to remember the smallest MS-DOS program to be CD 20h saved as a `.com`.

  • WillAdams 21 hours ago
    For more of the same (though I wish source was available) which actually does something useful, see the various small utilities at

    https://www.grc.com/freepopular.htm

  • ggerules 19 hours ago
    Windows and assembly is a fun topic!

    Putting the search terms "Windows" and "assembly language" turns up all sort of books. The one that got me to initially explore the topic (from 1993).... [0]

    For a more up to date treatment of assembly and windows.... comes with source code for the IDE also. Ray Seyfarth's book [1].

    [0] Windows Assembly Language & Systems Programming: Object Oriented & Low-Level Systems Programming in Assembly Language for Windows 3.X

    [1] Introduction to 64 Bit Windows Assembly Language Programming: Fourth Edition ISBN-13: 978-1543138849, ISBN-10: 1543138845

  • eggy 21 hours ago
    I should try FASM to see if it produces a smaller size exe. COM files are small, but 16-bit DOS was the thing back in the day - 100H yeah and basically a memory dump.
    • Bluestein 21 hours ago
      > 100H yeah and basically a memory dump

      ... the days! :)

  • p0w3n3d 15 hours ago
    Looks too kinky for me. WinAPI + C - okay. But not this
  • hnea3ekp5i 19 hours ago
    Appreciate you writing it up
  • drdexebtjl 21 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • JoeDaDude 20 hours ago
      What about his contributions to human civilization? ;)

      He got a world record score on the Tempest arcade game [1], then developed an AI which beat his own record[2]. His biggest failure was, that after rebuilding TEMPEST from arcade machine ROMS, he added levels to the game but never made them public [3].

      [1]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuSMCWu02hA

      [2]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdbpoDjIvPk

      [3]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjsVSEbXDOM

    • skinfaxi 20 hours ago
      My how the overton window has moved. Some of violative conduct is standard practice now.

      > When consumers prepared to purchase a product, additional services and products including a $9.95 back-up disc and $4.95 ‘optional extended service’ plan appeared on the check-out form. The form also listed “one free year of updates” – selected by default – but the company was then authorized to automatically charge a consumer’s credit card at the end of the year unless the buyer cancels the update plan.

      • drdexebtjl 18 hours ago
        But also things that are absolutely not okay:

        > Inducing computer users to install software by misrepresenting that the user's computer is at risk for crashes or privacy and security invasions.

        > Marketing its InternetShield software by means of a “free scan.”

        > Using “buttons” in its advertisements that do not function as the user would expect them. For example, the X found in the corner of a window is normally associated with closing the window and should not open another ad. Installing software on a user’s computer that causes multiple pop-up advertisements when the user tries to close out of advertisements.

        > Failing to provide a functional uninstall option for removing all software files.

        > Failing to obtain a consumer’s explicit consent to purchase a product or a service.

        • skinfaxi 18 hours ago
          Yes I thought I accounted for that with my use of "some". I wasn't intending to downplay anything.
    • Keyframe 19 hours ago
      Dave Cutler was a guest in his garage and it was a great episode. That lands some gravity at least?
      • whobre 16 hours ago
        Also Raymond Chen
    • silisili 17 hours ago
      It's frustrating, because he does do some cool things. But I had to quit following him because of his constant yarning about how he grew up not rich and made millions from Microsoft, so young people now are stupid and lazy.
    • rvz 21 hours ago
      Do you have any evidence of these (unsubstantiated) claims against him?
      • drdexebtjl 21 hours ago
        Edited with previous threads linking court documents.
    • TiredOfLife 21 hours ago
      He also lied about his contributions to Start menu
  • taf2 21 hours ago
    love this and it's timely as I think with AI more of my code will just be native assembly for example: https://github.com/taf2/tic-tac-toe my m series native assembly based tic tac toe windowed game... very portable too you just simply execute codex --yolo port my app to x y z host...
    • eggy 21 hours ago
      I haven't played with yolo yet. I'll have to use my airgapped, old Lenovo ThinkPad for this! Whenever I see yolo, I can't stop thinking of Joseph Redmon's YOLO and his astounding resume format!