The service XCancel is stopped until further notice

(xcancel.com)

81 points | by bio-s 15 hours ago

16 comments

  • ryandrake 15 hours ago
    I really don't think this is going to have the effect that X thinks it will have. I've always said that if XCancel and Nitter get taken down, I'm not going to suddenly decide to make an X account--I'm just going to stop reading their content.

    Same for old.reddit.com. If they kill it, I'm not going to give in and create an account--I'm just going to stop visiting.

    • ticoombs 14 hours ago
      They have killed old.reddit now. It forces you (or at least me) to login. Same with regular Reddit. Most threads I get an authwall after the top comment.

      (Im now entirely on HN and Lemmy)

      • mrtesthah 11 hours ago
        I use proxy software like redlib and teddit. The browser extension LibRedirect[1] makes these easy to use without conscious thought. They're read-only, but if you were going to post something, you'd have to sign in anyway.

        1. https://libredirect.manerakai.com

    • gdulli 14 hours ago
      I agree. I think of these alternatives as off-ramps, not replacements. In 2023 I ditched my Reddit and Twitter accounts thinking it would be very difficult. Today, the idea of losing the off-ramps no longer bothers me.
    • eviks 4 hours ago
      But a few other people will make an account to continue reading
      • fuzzfactor 28 minutes ago
        Still a major net loss in "eyeballs".

        If I was an advertiser on twitter I would be out of there too unless they proactively lowered ad fees real quick.

    • donmcronald 10 hours ago
      I started using Reddit after the Digg 4 fiasco. I mostly lurk. I like things like the localllama subreddit. If I log in to contribute it’s a high effort post with good information.

      Reddit can go ahead and extract as much value as possible by turning their site into a slop factory. I won’t be around to see it. I haven’t visited for a week after near daily use for 15 years.

      Reddit 4 isn’t for me.

    • DoesntMatter22 10 hours ago
      They aren’t gonna care because they aren’t making any money off of you anyway
      • roosterIllusi0n 4 hours ago
        They make money selling data with your info in it. That is why they care. They will eventually limit you to app only usage where they can grab more information.
      • nozzlegear 10 hours ago
        If they didn't care, why the Cease and Desist?
  • giamma 48 minutes ago
  • xvxvx 14 hours ago
    Read-only mode is a great way to entice new users to your platform. If you want to share or comment, you need an account. Blocking ALL access will not have that effect. I went from an active Twitter user to simply having a dozen X accounts bookmarked via xcancel. I can live without them.
  • urbandw311er 14 hours ago
    Just so you know – if you are reading this – X is no longer an effective form of publishing as I will not, now or ever, create an account just in order to read something that you have written on there.
    • donmcronald 10 hours ago
      X is the perfect named because it describes the core interaction after trying to view something on the site. Lmao.
  • bio-s 15 hours ago
    On Monday 24th August at 8PM EST, we received at letter from X Corp. asking to cease and desist the service XCancel. The service XCancel is stopped until further notice. We are seeking legal advice and won't share more details for now. Thank you for the trust you have put in these two years of XCancel.
    • cxr 14 hours ago
      Have you considered reaching out to users who actually create and own the material published on Twitter to work out a deal whereby xcancel.com would be permitted to publish their posts (regardless of what the cease and desist says)?
      • bio-s 7 hours ago
        Sorry, I’m not the owner of the website
        • fsuts 3 hours ago
          Then it may be better to put quotes around it so it looks like a quote. As copying it in plain text makes it look like your post
  • zmmmmm 14 hours ago
    Moves like this are nearly always a precursor to a user hostile change of some kind. I suppose anybody who didn't leave already are likely so rusted on they still won't budge, but people should definitely look for open alternatives at this point.
  • calmworm 6 hours ago
    Odd move on Twitter’s part. This will only hasten their demise. It’s like a restaurant that isn’t getting enough customers raising their prices to make more money.
  • big_toast 14 hours ago
    I don’t get why ai labs and staff didn’t move to Bluesky or something more open.

    Grok searching across x/twitter is too valuable to ignore or silo.

    X is effectively a high signal comment layer for the entire internet + quasi internet (arxiv) + real world.

    Same applies to any data silo I suppose, X just seems more straightforward to beachhead.

    • Hammershaft 13 hours ago
      I think the signal on X has been deteriorating for years. Many valuable communities that existed purely on Twitter have scattered across the internet after Elon's transformation, often to many disconnected small communities across X, Mastodon instances, BlueSky, and reddit.
    • jraph 7 hours ago
      > I don’t get why ai labs and staff didn’t move to Bluesky or something more open.

      Why would they, specifically? There's nothing particularly open about them.

    • roosterIllusi0n 4 hours ago
      If X is a high signal comment layer, than X must be able to tell real from fake bot posts while not sharing that info with users.
  • sea-gold 15 hours ago
  • skeledrew 4 hours ago
    Shouldn't be using X at all, even via proxy. Should have anticipated this happening eventually :shrugs:.
  • HardwareLust 15 hours ago
    Im surprised they let it run for 2 years. Still not going back to X though.
  • rtrann 7 hours ago
    There's always bluesky, great app and vision there.
    • lukeify 3 hours ago
      And an equally polarising and delusional userbase, like X, just on the other side of the spectrum.

      No thanks.

  • georgemcbay 13 hours ago
    I guess I'll just never read another tweet again.

    For the past year or so I've only ever read them (rarely, and only when tipped off about something worth reading from an external source) via xcancel.

    Would rather just not read anything on twitter ever again than be forced to the actual site.

  • lofaszvanitt 7 hours ago
    Gabe Newell said it eloquently about gaming piracy that it is a service problem not a money issue.

    Twitter has a UI/UX issue, and instead of fixing the clusterfuck, they decide to nuke sane alternatives. Maybe they live off of people's pain, and without that they can't function.

    Interesting times we live in.

    • danielbarla 6 hours ago
      I agree with Gabe Newell's take, however it absolutely is _also_ a money issue (which Steam went a long way to alleviating with regional pricing). Median PPP ratios for other continents are: Asia ~2.76x, Africa ~2.76x, Europe ~1.58x, etc.

      Currently new AAA titles debut for 60 to 80 USD. I'm wondering what the piracy situation would look like in the USA, if this was, say 160 to 220 USD; because that is what paying US prices feels like to the median person.

  • ChrisArchitect 12 hours ago
  • vmnb 9 hours ago
    sot we dot comm