13 comments

  • MostlyStable 2 hours ago
    The not needing an account is obviously not minor, but honestly, the UI is just better, by a lot. I made a twitter account a while ago using one of those throw away email address sites, so I have an account that I don't care about that I can use for twitter....but the experience just sucks. I don't know how any stands it, even if they don't mind needing an account.
    • ronsor 30 minutes ago
      The UI/UX is the main thing. I technically have an X-Twitter account that I rarely use, but loading plain HTML with a bit of JS beats loading a whole SPA experience just to read a post.
    • silverwind 18 minutes ago
      Yeah, the UI is the real and only reason to use Nitter. It's a very similar situation with old reddit.
    • bluecalm 38 minutes ago
      I think it's great. My feed is people posting tech/AI news, scientific publications, videos of rockets and self-driving cars, things made with coding agents etc. It's full of people who do meaningful work as well and you can see who they are. Dark mode, ability to easily copy images, link to posts, see posts of interesting people by going to their profile. On top of that the feed algorithm is open source and actually sane. What else would I want?

      It's by far the best designed social media site out there. I know it's a low bar but still.

      • UqWBcuFx6NV4r 29 minutes ago
        Yes well if your taste in content is “elon musk” then I imagine that your experience is fantastic.
        • lloydatkinson 18 minutes ago
          What an unintelligent remark.
          • teiferer 5 minutes ago
            I can concur though. I have a rarely used account and I get Elon on top of the feed all the time. Even as mobile notifications. I don't click on them and scroll past, but they keep coming.
    • throooooo 2 hours ago
      Seriously. The UX/UI on Twitter has always been a dumpster fire.
      • ksenzee 1 hour ago
        Eh. It was pretty great in 2008, when I used my spotty cell service to tweet road trip updates by texting 40404. O tempora, o mores, etc. etc.
  • arjie 2 hours ago
    Yeah, but most of these will fall. I used to use one or two of these to scrape my friends' posts because I stopped using Twitter and they'd inevitably all disappear in time. It's like chasing the latest TPB. In the end, I just logged in a headless browser and told an agent to fetch daily.
    • someonebaggy 1 hour ago
      They're all perfect substitutes. When one is down you can use another. They can't stop us all. I just wish there was a way to automatically redirect to a working instance.
    • sampullman 1 hour ago
      That's true, but TBP has been going pretty strong for over 2 decades. It can be hard to totally shut something down, if people want it.
      • noduerme 1 hour ago
        Sadly, the music selection has fallen off a cliff, and the rest is in a sharply downward spiral... in one sense this is because the music industry finally settled on a streaming model that most people are willing to rent, and it's also because the new generation has been brainwashed or trained out of storing their own files.
    • yoavm 29 minutes ago
      Did TPB ever change a domain? I've been using the .org domain listed on Wikipedia for as long as I can remember.
      • teiferer 3 minutes ago
        Then you are not in a country where it is blocked. (Or you VPN into one.)
    • Cider9986 1 hour ago
      Wdym "chasing the latest TPB"? Isn't 1337x and others better and offer a complete alternative?

      Twitter is different there's many stories that are only there.

      • someonebaggy 1 hour ago
        Switching torrent sites every time one gets taken down.

        But why wouldn't you?

    • done_lurking 2 hours ago
      What is TPB?
  • klntsky 12 minutes ago
    Is there something like a balancer that redirects me to an instance that is not down?
  • swyx 1 hour ago
    > How to obtain many sessions easily (public instances) The easiest way is to buy them here: https://hstockplus.com/accounts/twitter-x-accounts?sortBy=pr...

    > This way, you relay the account register process to the seller. These tokens are sold in the format username|password|2fa_code|cookies (including auth token, id and ct0), which makes it very easy and convenient for us to use.

    is this legit? this sounds extremely shady. maybe an ad?

    • miningtcup 47 minutes ago
      I know the guy and it does work, and it's not an ad. Accounts from that website are used on shitter.thepixora.com. The website is extremely sketchy though, he recommends that you don't give it more than a dollar at a time.
  • corvad 4 hours ago
    I guess X never heard of the Streisand effect...
    • noduerme 1 hour ago
      Elon has bought immunity to that. Streisand's flaw was that she gave a shit. Elon has unlocked the kinda reverse-Streisand that Trump has, where their popularity actually feeds on the effect.
  • someonebaggy 1 hour ago
    Will this list automatically update as instances hit rate limits or break for other reasons? Some public instances only have one account to log in with, some have thousands and use residential proxies.
  • agnosticmantis 4 hours ago
    Any user scripts that automatically redirect to a working instance?
  • alex1138 58 minutes ago
    What do we want the web to look like? Lock everything down behind logins, in the name of 'security' when the real goal is nyeh nyeh nyeh you can't see anything, sign up so we get more user metrics
  • kamma4434 54 minutes ago
    With or without the original interface, twitter is still a dumpster fire
  • add-sub-mul-div 4 hours ago
    We could stop thinking of them as walled gardens we're trying to get into and start thinking of them as quarantines for the Eternal September population.
    • delichon 4 hours ago
      > quarantines for the Eternal September population

      Hacker News actually has a way to do this quarantine, a version that only counts votes from accounts created before 2008: https://news.ycombinator.com/classic. About a decade after Eternal September started, but not bad.

      • bananaflag 2 hours ago
        Wow that's very interesting but it only works for the front page (and also only changes the order not the numbers), not for each comment page.

        Maybe we should have a setting "count only votes before date yyyy-mm-dd" but this would probably make the site too dynamic (?) and consume a lot of resources.

      • defrost 4 hours ago
        FWiW as an aside, it appears to count votes from December 2008 accounts (as just tested using this 2008-12-26 account).

        So that's at least strictly before 2009.

        • mitxela 51 minutes ago
          The vote count is just the normal vote count, so I guess only the ordering is different?
          • defrost 35 minutes ago
            It is, isn't it .. serves me right for breezing through that too quickly.

            If there's something magical going on, the ordering would be the only real distinction possible.

            Apparently the original (still the same?) dates back to the OG PG days:

            Ask HN: who knows about this - "http://News.YCombinator.com/classic"? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1832884

              It's what the frontpage would look like if only the votes of users who joined in the first year counted. I made it to check if the site is declining. In practice it's usually just a slower-changing version of the frontpage.
            
              ~ pg
      • randallsquared 2 hours ago
        Decade and a half, really. Eternal September was 1993 or 1994, right?
  • Petersipoi 5 hours ago
    Awesome. Let's all start using this on HN so we end up with a bunch of broken links in a few years
    • dadoum 4 hours ago
      They would become links with only a wrong domain, so I am not very worried about that personally.
      • mitxela 51 minutes ago
        It would be cool if libredirect could redirect a broken frontend instance to a working one.
    • bigbadfeline 3 hours ago
      > a bunch of broken links in a few years

      Who cares, by that time the originals and their copies would be a lot less worthy of viewing.